Archive for January, 2009

Inauguration

"Love In A Time of Blindness"
Originally published:  21 January 2009
Submitted by:  The Right Wing
Summary:  Examining the inauguration and current cabinet picks by President Obama.

"Why I Despise Liberals With All My Soul"
Originally published:  21 January 2009
Submitted by:  The Right Wing
Summary:  Highlighting racism and the conduct of attendees at the Inauguration towards the outgoing President.

"Closet Conservative: Liberals don’t think, plain and simple"
Originally published:  22 January 2009
Submitted by:  The Right Wing
Summary:  Reflections of a conservative working with liberals in a liberal city and on their reaction to Inauguration Day.

"A sign of things to come?"
Originally published:  20 January 2009
Submitted by:  U.S. Common Sense
Summary:  Reviewing the events of Inauguration Day and foreshadowing things to come.

"Chris Wallace"
Originally published:  21 January 2009
Submitted by:  U.S. Common Sense
Summary:  Reviewing if the oath that President Obama recited on Tuesday was valid.

Obama

"But what does Barack Obama represent? The Inauguration Story"
Originally published:  20 January 2009
Submitted by:  U.S. Common Sense
Summary:  Questioning supporters of President Obama on if they know what his plans are.

"Obama can change America"
Originally published:  18 January 2009
Submitted by:  U.S. Common Sense
Summary:  Discussing the history of race in our nations, and what impact Obama’s Presidency might have on it.

"Reflecting on Martin Luther King Jr."
Originally published:  19 January 2009
Submitted by:  U.S. Common Sense
Summary:  Remembering Martin Luther King Jr, and why there should not be a national holiday for him.

"Despite All My Rage I am Still Just a Rat in a Cage"
Originally published:  21 January 2009
Submitted by:  U.S. Common Sense
Summary:  Questioning what the future holds under the Democratic leadership.

Miscellaneous

"Watch The Suffering Ukraine"
Originally published:  20 January 2009
Submitted by:  U.S. Common Sense
Summary:  Russia has been denying Ukraine of fuel during the Winter season.

Contributing members:

If you wish to be a contributing member, please visit the Political Blog Listing for more information.


Middle East

"A dangerous opening gambit"
Originally published:  22 January 2009
Submitted by:  The Right Wing
Summary:  Discussing the executive order to close the prison at Guantanamo Bay in one year and how President Obama plans to handle the detainees.

"Hamas Is Not a Friendly Group of Humanists"
Originally published:  15 January 2009
Submitted by:  U.S. Common Sense
Summary:  Highlighting the current stage of the "religious war" between Israel and Hamas.

"Inside Gaza:  The Lynchpin of Lasting Peace in the Middle East"
Originally published:  21 January 2009
Submitted by:  U.S. Common Sense
Summary:  A detailed look into the variables at play in the Israel/Gaza conflict, and a look at the Middle East policy of President Obama.

"An Interesting discussion on Israel-Gaza"
Originally published:  15 January 2009
Submitted by:  U.S. Common Sense
Summary:  Discussing another approach to the Hamas/Israeli conflict.

"Winning Wars and Fighting Terrorism with ‘Humility and Restraint’"
Originally published:  21 January 2009
Submitted by:  U.S. Common Sense
Summary:  Examining President Obama’s inaugural speech to get an insight on his policy towards the Middle East.

"Indicting George Bush for War Crimes"
Originally published:  22 January 2009
Submitted by:  U.S. Common Sense
Summary:  What course of action should the next administration take regarding charges of war crimes against George Bush?

"The Growing Graveyard in Gaza"
Originally published:  15 January 2009
Submitted by:  U.S. Common Sense
Summary:  Commenting on how Gaza is turning into a graveyard of dead Palestinians and the concept of a new Palestinian state.

Bailout

"How Foreclosure is Bringing Back the American Dream"
Originally published:  16 January 2009
Submitted by:  U.S. Common Sense
Summary:  Seeing a silver lining in the housing crisis.

"The Government Needs to Bailout The Bee From CCD"
Originally published:  16 January 2009
Submitted by:  U.S. Common Sense
Summary:  Casting the spotlight back on the issue of disappearing bees in the United States.

"House Passes TARP Oversight, Senate Sends Mixed Signals"
Originally published:  21 January 2009
Submitted by:  U.S. Common Sense
Summary:  Discussing the House and Senate bills and why they do not agree over the language of the TARP Oversight rules.

View Comments

Today marks the end of your eight years in office. As the world prepares to usher in the new administration under President-elect Barack Obama, the press and critics are preparing to frame your legacy. I wanted to take a moment to highlight some of your accomplishments and failures, as well as the lessons learned that the new President should apply to his term in office.

For starters, we should look back at the condition facing our nation in 2000. Gas prices were increasing while the tech bubble was collapsing. The U.S. and NATO were involved in a nation-building exercise in the former Yugoslavia. Our Destroyer, the USS Cole, was attacked in an Yemeni harbor. The nation was split due to a close election. Today, gas prices are close to where they were in 2000, though coming off of a high over $4.00 per gallon. The U.S. and NATO are still operating in Eastern Europe, but are now also tied up with Afghanistan and Iraq. While we have not had an attack on U.S. soil since September 11th, we have seen increased sizable attacks on our allies, with the latest being India. And now, the nation is anticipating an era of change.

Change from what? It has been the word that the nation has heard for two years. For some, it is merely a change from Republican control to Democratic. Others are looking for a change from Conservative to Liberal policies. But for many, it is a change from what they view as the failures of your administration. There are two issues that many will remember your term in office for, being the war on terror and the condition the economy is in as you leave office.

For them, the war on terror lost its focus in 2003 when the nation decided to re-enter Iraq when we needed to put more troops into Afghanistan. Under the impression that Iraq was in the position to arm our enemies with weapons of mass destruction, a concern shared by the world following the chemical attacks he perpetrated against his own people as well as financing the families of suicide bombers, we entered Iraq with a small alliance of nations willing to go to battle. After five years of policing one nation and struggling to maintain control of another, people are looking for a change, a withdrawal from the Middle East.

The costs of the two wars are putting a burden on a national economy facing a failure of our economy, with the government spending a trillion dollars to bail out the companies, essentially nationalizing the financial sector. After years of financing the end of a recession through tax cuts for the individual taxpayer and companies alike, as well as deregulation on numerous sectors, the government increased the national debt to a record level, just to be tripled through bailouts. Coupled by an increase in unemployment initially triggered by record fuel prices and a drop in consumer spending, the anticipated tax returns for 2009 will come in well below projections.

Other failures listed include the slow response to New Orleans following Hurricane Katrina, interrogation techniques of foreign fighters held in the base at Guantanamo Bay, cooling ties with Russia, embryonic stem cell research, and No Child Left Behind. For them, the burden of your term in office was too much to bear. Even during the 2008 election campaign, members of your own party were running away from you in the hopes to win their elections. Though John McCain ran a hard campaign, he was unable to overcome the desire for change.

Though a large list of negatives, it is easy to overlook the positives from your time in office. While the number of attacks adverted on our soil is unknown, we do know that some plots have been foiled by the efforts of the Department of Homeland Security. While it is unfortunate that such a reorganization of our security and intelligence forces occurred in response to an attack, the pulling of our resources and sharing of information between branches was a needed response. Many of the tools used to protect us have come from the Patriot Act, even though the large bipartisan piece of legislation has since been chastised as an infringement of our personal liberties.

In addition to protecting us at home, our overseas achievements also paid dividends. Libya chose to renounce their weapons of mass destruction program. Yellowcake stockpiles within Iraq were liberated and transferred to Canada without the terrorists knowing. The financial accounts of terrorists were frozen across the world. New democracies formed in Iraq, Afghanistan, Ukraine, and Kosovo. With our partnership with Russia, the number of nuclear warheads around the globe has also been reduced.

One of the largest foreign policy successes occurred in Africa, where the U.S. has flooded the continent with funding and supplies to combat the spread of AIDS. Education on abstinence, funding for protection and the proving of medication to combat the epidemic has been the largest humanitarian project in the continent in our nations’ history. Additionally, supporting the new government in Liberia after years of hostile rule has improved the stability of the nation with whom we share a close historical bond.

Domestically, some might say your single largest accomplishment was placing John Roberts and Samuel Alito, Jr. on the Supreme Court. Both gentlemen are young compared to the rest of the Court, so their presence will influence the decisions for years to come. No Child Left Behind, even though the source of scorn by the teachers unions, was your hallmark bipartisan program. Teaming with Senator Ted Kennedy, the legislation revamped the ailing public school system by placing responsibility for achievement on both students and teachers. Initial scores show improvements in both reading and mathematics. Other domestic achievements include signing thirteen free trade agreements with other nations, Medicare prescription drug plan, and backing our country out of the Kyoto agreement.

From both the achievements and disappointments from your time in office, the are lessons learned that President-elect Obama can use towards his policy decisions. For starters, the State Department and the Department of Defense need to work closer together when preparing to combat future problems abroad. While we had a successful plan to liberate Afghanistan and Iraq, our post-liberation plans came up soft. Iraq fell out of control for almost a year when basic security and protection within the major cities and government failed while our military forces were spread out across the country searching for weapons and terrorists.

Working with the United Nations is a double-edged sword. While having their rubber stamp of approval for engaging forces in different countries is beneficial, getting them to provide aid and support is next to impossible. If we are to enter into Sudan or any other nation requiring our forces, we should plan that the U.N. will not be sending forces or aid until after the area is secured. But so we aren’t seen as ignoring the organization that we provide the bulk of the funding for, we need to encourage the U.N. for more humanitarian projects such as providing emergency aid to regions ravished by natural disasters.

Global warming is not something that can be legislated on the international scene; especially one nation carries the bulk of the burden. The Kyoto agreement was fundamentally flawed with large nations such as China and India limited or exempt from responsibility while the United States was singled out to make the largest changes. Each nation should be encouraged to set their own goals for improving the environment to the best of their abilities. In the end, even small changes added together leads to large improvement.

Spending of federal dollars needs to have better management. The latest push to remove pork from legislation is just the start, though legislation such as Pay-Go should be dead on arrival. If 2008 hasn’t taught us anything, the fundamental concept behind Pay-Go is flawed. We would not be able to bailout the financial sector for a trillion dollars with anticipated tax revenues shrinking. If anything, our nation should have a fiscal policy that is inverted from Pay-Go: increased deficit spending during lean economic years, while decreasing spending during strong economic years.

Our emergency coordination and response needs to be better coordinated between the federal government down to the local communities. Hurricane Katrina exposed numerous flaws in the way we prepare for, and then respond to emergencies. The catastrophe in Mississippi was handled well since the local and state government was able to relocate residents before the storm hit, getting them out of harms way. New Orleans, on the other hand, essentially abandoned the residents, even though much of the city lies below sea level and the forecast for a major disaster was well known. After the storm had passed, blocked roads and washout bridges delayed our relief supply deployments. While our helicopters were able to enter the area to airlift refugees, we were not airlifting basic necessities into the region in quantities sufficient to hold the survivors over until the trucks arrive. In the future the federal government needs to ensure the local governments heed the warnings and require evacuations to take place.

Lastly, the federal government and the policies need to be more in line with the Constitution. Even though the Medicare prescription drug plan was a success, with the byproduct being increased competition for basic retail drugs, the concept of federal healthcare is outside of the scope of the Constitution. The same goes with SCHIP, Social Security, bailouts of the automotive industry, and so on. Additionally, the Congress needs to return to the process of declaring war, rather than passing resolutions. By declaring war, our nation has more tools at her disposal to combat the enemy.

In closing, I want to thank you for your dedication and service to our country. Your first term did not get off to a good start due to the unexpected division within our country following the election. Then September 11th derailed your domestic and foreign policy plans, though you have worked hard to ensure our country doesn’t get attacked again. Continuing with the preparation, you have worked closely with the Obama transition team to get the up to speed. This level of cooperation, especially between two different political ideologies, has not been seen in recent memory. So thank you once again, and I wish you a long and happy retirement.

View Comments

“Hey Barney Frank, Thanks for the Housing Crisis”
Originally published: 10 January 2009
Submitted by: U.S. Common Sense
Summary:  Taking another look at the roles Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac played in the current economic downturn.

“Obama to negotiate with terrorists – Didn’t see that coming!”
Originally published:  9 January 2009
Submitted by:  U.S. Common Sense
Summary:  Tracing the ties President-elect Obama has with pro-Palestinian organizations.

“Quick Comment on Paterson’s Consolidation Ideas”
Originally published:  8 January 2009
Submitted by:  U.S. Common Sense
Summary:  Examining the possibility of consolidating school districts to save money.

“The Conflict Involved in Creating My Morals”
Originally published:  10 January 2009
Submitted by:  U.S. Common Sense
Summary:  Questioning whether the one life is worth more than another.

“Gouge Away: How a spike in fuel prices has bakers and wheat farmers raking in the dough”
Originally published:  11 January 2009
Submitted by:  U.S. Common Sense
Summary:  Swings in oil and gas prices have created an environment where bakeries are making large profits.

“A disgusting development”
Originally published:  12 January 2009
Submitted by:  U.S. Common Sense
Summary:  Discussing the ramifications of Israel banning Arab political parties from the upcoming general elections.

“Iran Opens Second Front Against Israel”
Originally published:  8 January 2009
Submitted by:  U.S. Common Sense
Summary:  Examining if Hezballah’s rocket attack on Israel was actually an attack by Iran.

“Risk Adverse Politicians”
Originally published:  12 January 2009
Submitted by:  U.S. Common Sense
Summary:  When do you put the need of the country above the need of your political career?

Contributing members:

If you wish to be a contributing member, please visit the Political Blog Listing for more information.


“Life Jackets Are Not Polar Bear Gear This Year”
Originally published:  7 January 2009
Submitted by:  U.S. Common Sense
Summary:  Discussing the need to look past the hype and examine the reality of global warming.

“Obama: ‘It’s Too Late to Save Economy’”
Originally published:  12 January 2009
Submitted by:  U.S. Common Sense
Summary:  Examining the ironies and consequences of Obama’s call for Congress to act quickly on the economy.

“Israel’s Invasion Of Gaza Is Ballot Box Fear”
Originally published:  10 January 2009
Submitted by:  U.S. Common Sense
Summary:  Making the case that the latest incursion into Gaza is more for political gain rather than self-defense.

“New Earmark Transparency Rules”
Originally published:  7 January 2009
Submitted by:  U.S. Common Sense
Summary:  Discussing the proposal to make earmarks more transparent to the general public.

“Illinois House Votes to Impeach Governor Rod Blagojevich”
Originally published:  9 January 2009
Submitted by:  U.S. Common Sense
Summary:  Explanations by the Illinois House as to why they voted nearly unanimously to impeach the Governor.

View Comments

Survivors of US Air 1549 stand on the wings of the plane in the Hudson River while waiting to be rescuedMiracles do happen. Today, it happened on the Hudson River in New York. Shortly after talking off from LaGuardia Airport on Long Island, USAir flight 1549 flew into a flock of birds. The birds were sucked into the two engines on the wings, causing them to fail. Banking across Manhattan Island, the plane glided South along the Hudson River until the pilot decided to ditch the plane into the water. Angling the nose of the plane up while slowly descending, the plane was able to land smoothly and evenly on the waters’ surface.

Within minutes, the survivors of the plane crash started to exit the plane and stand on the wings and crawl into survival rafts. They were pleasantly surprised to be greeted by water taxi’s and ferry boats that were in the water and tracking the plane as it came down. Before long, rescue boats were on the scene, the plane was tied to one of the boats and all passengers and crewmembers were rescued. Other than a few broken bones and sore heads, there were no major injuries or fatalities. Some of the passengers were actually released and sent home shortly after being examined.

As someone who was on a plane that lost an engine on take off (out of Washington, DC), I know how unsettling the experience can be, even though our plane was still under control and landed safely, thanks to the skilled flight crew. The flight crew and the professional and civilian rescuers from today’s accident are all heroes today and deserve as much credit as they receive. I also compliment the passengers for remaining calm and evacuated the plane safely and in an orderly fashion. For the few individuals that were injured, we pray for their quick recovery and that they can return to their families.

Related articles:
NBC New York – “Miracle on the Hudson”
The Smoking Gun – “The Hero Of Flight 1549″
New York Post – “Hero Pilots Disabled Plane To Safety”
WCBS TV – “‘Miracle’ Crash Landing In The Hudson”
NY Daily News – “US Airways airplane crashes in Hudson River – Hero pilot Chesley Sullenberger III saves all aboard”
Times Online – “US Airways Airbus A320 crash lands in New York’s Hudson River”
The Wall Street Journal – “Safe Water Landing a Remarkable Feat”

View Comments

That could be the headlines in the near future according to a report by the U.S. Joint Forces Command (JFCOM). In the report, JFCOM focuses on the instability within Mexico and Pakistan, placing them on their watch list. With Mexico, drug violence and corruption dominates most of the nation, with the drug lords issuing threats to Mexican police saying, “Join us or die.” So, what would happen if the government collapses, and how should the US react?

Map of the drug cartels currently operating in MexicoCurrently, the drug cartels are targeting the commanders and other heads of the local police forces, taking out the leadership of the first line of defense within the community. The police forces are trying to recruit as many new members as possible, but if the citizens start sinking into a sense of fear for personal safety (similar to some cities in Iraq during the insurgency), the streets would become property of the drug cartels. Those police that remain will probably submit to the drug cartels and become hired help.

As a response, the Mexican military would be forced from an offensive to a recapture/hold mission. With seven organized drug cartels operating in all areas of the nation, the military would be spread too thin. With only 193,000 military forces on hand, they would not be able to police and defend 32 states if the cartels organized in a single force. What remains is a nation with a sovereign government in name only, as they have officially lost control of their territory and their borders. Chiapas and Tabasco become gaping holes within the national security structure, allowing for easy access for cartel supplies and supporters to pour within the nation.

The US has one immediate response: defend her borders. The National Guard forces from all of the southern Border States and probably some of the other Midwestern states, will be activated and deployed to the border to stop the anticipated flow of refugees into our country. With 17 Million Mexicans living in the six states bordering the US, the US Border Patrol would be instantly overrun without the additional support.

The next step by the US would be to provide military support. Our nation would not be able to operate as freely if our nation bordered a country that lacked internal control and international cooperation. Depending on our situation in the Middle East, we may have to redeploy forces, call for volunteers, or even institute a draft. Policing a state of roughly 25 Million people in Iraq is a relatively simple task compared to 112 Million people in a nation four times the size. The US has roughly 3 Million active duty and reserve military personnel that could be called up to assist the Mexican forces.

Imagine this: What if the nation completely collapses, fracturing into either 32 smaller independent states or a handful of federations. Would the US consider accepting some of the states/federations into our Union? Some of the northern Mexican states have established infrastructure and businesses, making them less of a financial burden than some of the other states if we did accept them. But how many of the Mexican states should we accept? If the Mexican government collapsed due to the drug cartels, would the US be able to remove the cartels from our new territory?

Two phase approach to the Liberation of MexicoThere are a lot of questions, but in a worst case scenario, all angles need to be addressed. To answer some of the questions, this would be my view of how the US would respond. Taking a logical approach, the US forces would work their way south, starting with the six Border States. Once we have stabilized those states, we would proceed south to the next five states. This would give us control over 25.3 Million people and roughly half of the total land area of Mexico. If the Mexican government has collapsed by this point, the US would be able to begin to form and train a Mexican national force to supplement the US forces with policing these nine states, allowing our fighting forces to continue their push south.

Once the nation is under US control, the next phase will be to reestablish state police and guard forces to take over national security while the national government is reconstituted. During this period, the US would be in control, more in the way we managed the Philippines rather than Iraq. With the new government in full control of the administrative duties of the nation, and the military and police forces brought back up to 100% ready status, the US would turn over control and return home. The process should take five to ten years, depending on the level of organization the drug cartels have within Mexico and how much damage was done to the infrastructure.

This is not a scenario any of us would like to see. The US will be distracted for at least a decade dealing with just Mexico, possibly leading to us retreating from key parts of the world. Our businesses would evolve into a more nationally-focus economy than a global economy to ensure our forces have the right equipment, enough food, and construction supplies to quickly respond to our logistical needs within the northern nine Mexican states during the occupation. This retreat, both politically and economically, would put us behind in the world once the hemisphere returns to a state of calm. My hope is that this would be a blessing in disguise, giving our companies a desire to be more competitive and innovative in the new international marketplace.

Related articles:
El Paso Times – “U.S. military report warns ‘sudden collapse’ of Mexico is possible”
FOX News – “Military Report: Mexico, Pakistan at Risk of ‘Rapid and Sudden Collapse’”
The Oil Drum – “Mexico: A Nation-State Dissolves?”
Newser – “Drug Lords to Mexican Cops: Join Us or Die”
Congressional Research Service – “Mexico’s Drug Cartels” (pdf format)

View Comments