In some ways, the Republicans had both the easier and harder task in their response to President Obama’s State of the Union address. Easier in the sense that they didn’t have to go into specific on the various issues, but harder because they had only a limited amount of time to respond and that they were following the President himself. Taking a look at Virginia’s Governor Bob McDonnell’s speech, I come away with the following thoughts.
McDonnell opens his response by addressing the history of Virginia and his political lineage to Thomas Jefferson (the second Governor of Virginia). Speaking from the Congressional Hall designed by Jefferson, McDonnell quotes Jefferson from his first Inaugural address, saying “a wise and frugal Government … shall leave [men] free to regulate their own pursuits of industry … and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned.” The purpose of these constant references to Jefferson, other than to highlight the position Jefferson had about a limited Federal government as well as his history to Virginia, is because Jefferson remains one of the Democratic Party’s icons. By linking himself to Jefferson and to small government, he is creating an image of how the Democrats have drifted away from their historical positions.
The first main topic McDonnell discusses is the current unemployment rate in the country. Chastising the currently Democratic-led Congress and the President over their economic proposals, he stresses that the best way for the economy to recover and for jobs to be created is by easing the burden on US companies. With proposals such as the $1 Trillion Health Care Reform proposals in Congress and the economic stimulus packages that will increase our national debt, McDonnell stresses how the economic burden will become too great for the nation. He highlights the Republican proposals on Health Care Reform that achieves similar goals as the Democrats without the large cost or complex legislation.
Switching the topic to energy, McDonnell references Obama’s comment on domestic energy production and Obama’s obstruction for nuclear power and oil exploration expansions. This expansion will lead to more jobs, meaning the need for a new educated workforce. He segways into discussing the need for student choice in schools and the need to award teachers for their “excellent performance.”
He concludes by addressing national security last. There were concerns about the President being too soft on national security when he entered office. McDonnell applauds Obama’s decision to provide additional support to the troops in Afghanistan as well as the successes of our troops in Iraq. Some recent events however, such as the Detroit plane bomber and the decision to try terrorists in the shadow of the World Trade Center, have justified some of their doubts about his ability to protect the nation.
It was a brief speech, but I think it was the best State of the Union response we’ve seen in quite some time. Bobby Jindal’s comedic response last year, as well as Tim Kaine’s head-scratching “there is a better way” mystery from four years ago have taken the credibility of the response away until the other night. The decision to hold the response in front of a live audience (even though they were all McDonnell supporters) was a good choice, especially since it gave the impression of a similar forum that the President enjoyed. However, as with all responses, the speech was light on details and over-generalized.
One of the best aspects of covering these speeches is to hear the give-and-take between the various parties. While debating political issues with people of all stripes, we can identify when someone is trying to spin an issue and when someone is being serious trying to resolve the issue. Both Republicans and Democrats are guilty of spinning, as Obama did with discussing the debt and McDonnell with national security. However, both are also serious about seeing the nation improve. While political ideologies are hard to work with, there is enough common ground on issues where I think the politicians can work together to leave our nation in a better condition than they found it. Small, targetted reforms will achieve this goal, but only if the politicians are willing.
